<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Shawshank Redemption&#8221;- best film not to recieve Oscar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kinoscope.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/the-shawshank-redemption-best-film-not-to-recieve-oscar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kinoscope.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/the-shawshank-redemption-best-film-not-to-recieve-oscar/</link>
	<description>“The length of a film should be directly related to the endurance of the human bladder.” - Alfred Hitchcock</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Plowman</title>
		<link>http://kinoscope.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/the-shawshank-redemption-best-film-not-to-recieve-oscar/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Plowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kinoscope.wordpress.com/?p=26#comment-140</guid>
		<description>I love Shawshank - it does deserve to be number 1!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Shawshank - it does deserve to be number 1!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
